We received two reviews for this manuscript. The first, by Andrew P. Davison \citep{Davison}, recommends a minor revision. Davison notes that the work fills a gap in the landscape of reproducible computational research, and could help expand the usage of runtime provenance capture of computations. The second review, by Fernando Chirigati \citep{Chirigati}, recommends a major revision. Chirigati says that proposing a common platform for managing records from computational-provenance tools (like Sumatra and ReproZip) is an interesting idea, but omissions in the manuscript prevent a full assessment of the contribution.